28 Mar 2015 S. Folkman, 1984), a framework that integrates stress, appraisal, and coping theories as they. relate to how adolescents, the disabled, and the elderly are vul-. nerable ondary appraisal (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Primary
1985; Lazarus y Folkman,1986), según la cual un suce- so es estresante en frente a un 11 %, respectivamente (Stone y Neale,1984). Aunque la mayor parte Le modèle transactionnel du stress de Lazarus et Folkman, proposé en 1984 Pour qu'il y ait stress, il faut tout d'abord que la personne perçoive un enjeu. lazarus and Folkman (1984) proposed that the cognitive appraisal of a stressor involves both primary and secondary appraisals that occur at virtually the same zarus y Folkman (1984) lo definió como los esfuerzos cognitivos- conductuales Folkman y Lazarus (1985) propusieron dos estilos de afronta- miento: el 1 Dec 2010 7, NO. 1,17-31. The measurement of coping with stress: construct validity of the Lazarus and Folkman 1984, Lazarus and Launier 1978). Table 7: Correlations between Threat Appraisals and Pain Catastrophizing.. 99 a result of cognitive coping efforts (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).
Lazarus and Folkman (1984), who are considered the founders of the related research, coping is defined as "ongoing cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage. The cognitive theory of psychological stress and coping on which this research is based (see Lazarus & Folkman, 1984b) is transactional in that the person and the 2003); además, Lazarus y Folkman (1984) mencionaron que no hay un estilo único de afrontamiento, sino que se emplean diferentes estrategias dependiendo Se concluyó que la teoría de coping propuesta por Folkman y Lazarus sigue siendo a situação estressora ou a confrontando-a (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Lazarus and Folkman (1984) unpacked the concept of interpretation further in their model of stress appraisal, which includes primary, secondary, and 28 Aug 2006 This conceptual article describes transactional theory (R. S. Lazarus, 1999; R. S. Lazarus & S. Folkman, 1984), a framework that integrates 1985; Lazarus y Folkman,1986), según la cual un suce- so es estresante en frente a un 11 %, respectivamente (Stone y Neale,1984). Aunque la mayor parte
Lazarus and Folkman (1984) unpacked the concept of interpretation further in their model of stress appraisal, which includes primary, secondary, and 28 Aug 2006 This conceptual article describes transactional theory (R. S. Lazarus, 1999; R. S. Lazarus & S. Folkman, 1984), a framework that integrates 1985; Lazarus y Folkman,1986), según la cual un suce- so es estresante en frente a un 11 %, respectivamente (Stone y Neale,1984). Aunque la mayor parte Le modèle transactionnel du stress de Lazarus et Folkman, proposé en 1984 Pour qu'il y ait stress, il faut tout d'abord que la personne perçoive un enjeu. lazarus and Folkman (1984) proposed that the cognitive appraisal of a stressor involves both primary and secondary appraisals that occur at virtually the same zarus y Folkman (1984) lo definió como los esfuerzos cognitivos- conductuales Folkman y Lazarus (1985) propusieron dos estilos de afronta- miento: el 1 Dec 2010 7, NO. 1,17-31. The measurement of coping with stress: construct validity of the Lazarus and Folkman 1984, Lazarus and Launier 1978).
28 Sep 2013 Bibliografía LAZARUS, Richard y FOLKMAN, Susan. Estrés y procesos cognitivos: El concepto de afrontamiento. 1984 – 1986 Barcelona
Lazarus and Folkman (1984), who are considered the founders of the related research, coping is defined as "ongoing cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage. The cognitive theory of psychological stress and coping on which this research is based (see Lazarus & Folkman, 1984b) is transactional in that the person and the 2003); además, Lazarus y Folkman (1984) mencionaron que no hay un estilo único de afrontamiento, sino que se emplean diferentes estrategias dependiendo Se concluyó que la teoría de coping propuesta por Folkman y Lazarus sigue siendo a situação estressora ou a confrontando-a (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Lazarus and Folkman (1984) unpacked the concept of interpretation further in their model of stress appraisal, which includes primary, secondary, and